This title, taken from chapter 7 of communicating
nature poses a very important question. Why do animals matter to us? Is it
some innate connection with “animality” that draws us to them? How can some
people destroy animals without a care, while others spend their entire lives
protecting them? Do animals connect human beings more with nature? Do animals
have the same natural rights, feelings, emotions as humans? These questions
were all raised throughout our readings and viewings this week. The answers may
be different for some. The important part is that we ask these questions in the
first place.
“Am I Blue?” By Alice walker was a nice read,
filled with moral and ethical issues that are personified through the story of
the horse, Blue. I had to read it a few times to really grasp how I wanted to
interpret the story. One of the first things that stood out to me was the
subject of inequality. Throughout the story, there are multiple references to
slavery, racism, injustices for the Native Americans, a hint of Eco-feminism,
animal cruelty, etc. However one of the underlying themes of inequality that I
derived from the story early on was inequality amongst sexual orientation. She refers to the person she was staying with
as her “companion” and “partner.” yet never reveals his/her gender. A little
bit of research from an article titled “Alice
Walker on motherhood and estrangement from her only child” revealed that
Alice does not identify with one sexual orientation, but considers herself
“curious.” I couldn’t help but believe that including her partner/companion in
THIS story was deliberate. I’m not exactly sure why, but I know it wasn’t by
accident. Maybe she wants to make the parallel between animal cruelty and human
cruelty. She does describe the horse with human emotions such as bored, angry,
hateful and hurt. Maybe this story about Blue the horse isn’t just looking to
expose animal cruelty. The more obvious theme of this story was indeed animal
inequality; humans losing their childhood connections with animals, and thus,
losing any sense of moral or ethical concern for animals.
“No, I was shocked
that I had forgotten that human animals and nonhuman animals can communicate
quite well; if we are brought up around animals as children we take this for
granted. By the time we are adults we
no longer remember.”
But maybe, it’s using animal cruelty as a metaphor or symbol
for human cruelty in general. I think there are lot of ethical issues being
brought up in this short story, some obvious, some not so obvious.
Admittedly, I’m not a huge fan of poetry. But what I like
about our class is that we use multiple sources of media and literature to
discuss important themes concerning Environmentalism. In this case, I thought
the poem “Meeting
Wolf” by Mary Oliver
was beautiful and appropriate, and really gave us a chance to interpret freely
without the constrictions of visual aid or lengthy, wordy description.
Line three, stanza one: “inside his golden eyes” instantly
brought me to back to another environmental work: Aldo Leopold’s “Thinking like
a mountain.”
“We reached
the old wolf in time to watch a fierce green fire dying in her eyes.”
There is something amongst the environmental community that
is symbolized in the eyes of wolves.
Maybe wolves are a great symbol of freedom and nature. Maybe the eyes of
the wolf personify the struggle of the natural world vs humans. Whatever it is,
I’ve come to realize that the wolf is a very important symbol.
I found yet another connection to Leopold and this poem. The
third stanza states:
“And this is what I
think: I have given him intrusion.”
Similarly, Leopold writes:
“I realized then, and have known ever since, that
there was something new to me in those eyes—something known only to her and to the mountain.”
Maybe the wolf is symbolic of the mystique of nature. Maybe
the secrets of the wild are hidden within the eyes of the wolf. Humans cannot comprehend the connection between
non-human animals and nature. Humans will and cannot see through the eyes of
the wolf.
Linda Hogan’s
“wolves” expands upon this connection with humans and wolves. At one point, she
makes reference to how the Anishnabe people believe that we descended from
wolves, long ago. Darwin would disagree, but the spiritual connection is
touching and I believe more symbolic of this idea of wolves, nature, and our
connection to both.
“No matter the reason
we say we are here, all of us are intent on seeing the wolves, or hearing them
wail the song our Ancestors new the words to.”
“How I became
an Elephant” and “The Cove” were
incredibly eye opening films about the exploitation and mistreatment of
animals, particularly elephants and dolphins. I noticed many similarities
within these two films. The filming style is smooth and informative, yet
purposely disturbing. The videos seem to combine documentary like interviews,
first person perspective shots, and cinema-like filming. The films focus in on two main protagonists
and their battles to save animals: Juliette West and Ric O’Barry . Both are inspiring
characters that the directors use as a source of inspiration to personify and
figurehead real life movements for animal equality. And both of these films
have sub messages or themes that extend beyond the surface.
Ric O’Barry is an incredible character who tells a
fascinating story about how he basically created the demand for dolphins, and
how he plans to destroy the industry he helped build. The film also exposes the
selling of dolphin meat laced with mercury, and the subsequent government cover
up. I thought “the Cove” was a very
powerful movie. I liked the use of home-video style scenes, and the ironic
marketing films used by sea world and what we perceive as positive interactions
with dolphins. Irony seems to be a huge theme in this film. The irony of the Japanese
town with all the dolphin signs. The irony of Ric O’Barry being the flipper
trainer. The irony of being able to eat dolphin meat while watching dolphin
shows. Trying to keep a low profile in japan while at the same time making a
film to exploit dolphin mistreatment to the world. I think that irony is a great
tool that is well utilized in this film.
On the surface, Juliette is a totally different character
than Ric. However, her convictions and her story are motivational in the same
way. Her story has the sub-plot of becoming a woman, and learning what she
wants to stand for as a strong young lady. The film also incorporated this
theme of eastern ideologies mixing with western ideologies, for a common cause.
I think that the innocence of Juliette aids in her quest to draw the audience
to her cause.
These films really wanted to upset people, and for me, it
worked. The voice-over explanation of how sound stresses out dolphins, while
showing the dolphins being rounded up and selected for either sale or slaughter,
was incredibly sad. The scene where the one dolphin was swimming towards the
crew, while bleeding and dying, was really upsetting. The abundance of blood
and gore from the elephants and dolphins was intentional and well-used. Watching
the elephants being beat and chained really made me empathize with these
creatures in a way I haven’t since I was child. I think that is where the theme
of “Am I Blue”, this idea of a natural childhood connection with animals,
resonated with me. Also, the deep sea diver from “the cove”, Mandy, made a
point that I really connected with strongly. I recently went snorkeling in
Aruba, and swimming amongst the hundreds of fish was a life changing
experience. The entire dive was silent, and I felt a connection with wildlife
that I hadn’t ever really felt before. I really loved and appreciated the scene
with her swimming and petting the dolphins.
My article relates to a point that I made earlier in the
blog about Alice Walker and using the story of blue to personify other human
issues through the tale of animal cruelty. This article, “Animal
cruelty and domestic abuse,” makes the connection between cruelty towards
animals and cruelty towards humans.
Anthony,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog this week. You have a lot of insightful connections between themes in the different readings we had that were very interesting. I found your discussion on inequality as a theme of “Am I Blue” very insightful. I did not think much about her use of the word “partner”, but the way you present it makes it make sense now. You do a good job choosing what quotes to include; the ones in the blog support your ideas as well. I really enjoyed you bringing poetry into the discussion. The poem is beautiful and lovely to read, and it is connected to our theme this week. I especially liked the comparison you made between Juliette West and Ric O'Barry- they are both heroes in their own ways. Mentioning the irony found in The Cove was a great point, I too find it interesting that Barry went from working in the industry to fighting against it! I’m glad these documentaries helped you empathize with the animals like you did as a child. I think reconnecting in ways like this is important for our tasks in the future to try and ease the suffering of animals. I also really like the article you chose to include. I think that animal cruelty is a huge issue today and the article was very relevant in explaining the whys as well as some solutions. Throughout the blog, there were some grammatical mistakes but nothing took away from your ideas. Don’t forget to capitalize titles of the books or films, as this is very important. Other than a few slight errors, I really thoroughly enjoyed reading your blog this week. I could feel the emotions you put into it after watching the horrifying truth from the documentaries. Well done!
Cathy