Does anyone really know what nuclear is, or what it really
does? If we’re being honest, I didn’t know anything about it. And sure you’ll
hear some people say that nuclear is a good thing and you’ll hear the opposite from
the others, but nuking nuclear would be beneficial if we don’t want to hurt our
planet as well as ourselves.
Full
Body Burden by Kristen Iversen talks about the “Nuclear Family”, from her perspective
and what it felt like growing up near Rocky Flats, a nuclear power plant. It’s
a gripping memoir that switches from destructive family secrets (her father’s
alcoholism), “When my mother asks me later if we stopped at the liquor store, I
say no. I know what not to say, what subjects are taboo, and what secrets must
remain secrets.” As well as the destructive government secrets (cancer); “Dow
Chemical has left Rocky Flats after two decades of accidents, plutonium
releases, and safety problems, most of which are still hidden under the cloak
of Cold War secrecy. Now that Rockwell has stepped in, it’s business as usual.”
I really enjoyed the tone, and the personal connection makes the reader, at
least in my case, care more about the effects of nuclear. It’s when the fire
breaks out on Mother’s Day that sets the start of the story forward because of
all the plutonium released into the atmosphere.
While Full Body Burden is a personal account on
nuclear energy, the documentary Into Eternity discusses the effects nuclear emissions have and
the damage it can cause showing the waste management at Onkalo. It’s scary
because just like in Full Body Burden the results that can occur with
the use of nuclear power is serious. There were the cases of cancer spreading
in children throughout the small town of Rocky Flats, Colorado, and the fact
that people exposed to the nuclear waste won’t realize they’re sick until it’s
too late.
Into Eternity does
a very good job at depicting the harmful effects of nuclear power visually. The
overall tone is very ominous and doom and gloom. There is one thing in
particular that the director, Michael Madsen, does that is very powerful and
really encapsulates the message the film is trying to get across. He lights a
match and speaks directly into the camera while he’s “in a place you shouldn’t
be,” and talks until the light goes out and the viewer is left looking into
darkness. It’s creepy and I got to admit it made me feel like I was watching
some sort of horror flick, which is what I take to be the point. The
documentary is from an objective point of view, but that doesn’t mean it’s any
less effective. In fact with dreary undertone and dark colors, it makes it more
effective.
Even after all this,
still some people will tell you to use nuclear energy. They’ll say it’s better
for the planet than carbon emissions and it’s what we as a society should look
into to fix the climate change problem. On April 22, 2015, CNN posted this
article, “Obama
should embrace nuclear energy” by U.S. Senator Jim Inhofe, that dismissed
the Obama Administration because they weren’t moving forward with nuclear
energy to use as the climate change solution. The article talks about how much
better nuclear is than carbon, but fails to mention why Obama would not use
nuclear or its downsides. It clearly paints the picture that nuclear energy is
our solution without showing what Into
Eternity brought into light.
This time
lapse video of every nuclear explosion since 1945 is a must watch,
especially if you’re on the fence about the use of nuclear energy. It’s slow
going at first and is fifteen minutes long, but the ticking before the
explosions go off is almost as creepy and effective as Into Eternity. As the video moves further and further along, the
ticking increases as well as the explosions and it’s just really powerful to
watch as the nuclear explosions reflect the time progression.
However the most powerful short film we watched had to be Blind. Watching this horrible version of a contaminated future
was downright depressing, not to mention the story behind it. The most moving
moment was when the backdrop changed and he was left alone with his deceased
daughter. I think the quote at the end of the film best exemplifies the truth
about nuclear and why we need to be more aware of what’s going on, “Turning away
from today’s reality will blind our future.”
After watching and reading all that I have, it’s hard to
believe that nuclear power would be any good. Just imagine if you were that
nuclear family? Or just lived in that neighborhood near Rocky Flats? I just picture
my pets becoming ill because of this exposure and not knowing until there was
nothing left to do. It’s hard, so if you’re confused I don’t blame you. Senator
Inhofe, makes a persuasive argument and I’m sure others who agree will give you
more of the same. Still I think getting rid of nuclear energy, or rather nuking
nuclear, is a safer bet. I don’t want to live in the future Into Eternity and Blind painted, and I don’t want to have to experience what Kristen
Iversen endured.
Nicole,
ReplyDeleteOnce again a great blog to end out the semester! I like the comparison of a nuclear family to the nuclear situation that the characters in Full Body Burden find themselves in. I also really enjoyed how you tied the pieces together through topic sentences and transition paragraphs. I think the inclusion of the CNN article was great as it shows how writer’s bias could affect the article. Being skeptical about what we read is always good, as it allows us to see the true meaning behind a piece of work. I also liked how in the end you related it to your own life, showing that nuclear energy will simply hurt us over all in the future. Great work!
Brian