By Isabelle Naimo
Hydraulic fracturing. Sounds pretty intimidating, right?
It did for me, at least. Despite being an Environmental Humanities major at Stony
Brook University since the fall of 2014 and a self-proclaimed enthusiast about
all things green for a couple of years prior, I never really knew what
hydraulic fracturing was. I mean, I knew it was something bad. But I didn’t know exactly what made it bad or what it actually
meant in the first place. I could probably chalk up my cluelessness on the
matter to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is usually surrounded by a lot of
political debate. And politics are a sure-fire way to make my brain go into
cruise control. So this week was a struggle to grasp all the facts, truly a learning
experience.
More commonly known as fracking, hydraulic fracturing
refers to the process of creating fractures in rock formations by drilling and
inserting fluid into the cracks, therefore forcing the cracks to open further,
allowing gas and oil to escape so it can be extracted. Fracking has become a
hot topic circulating around the United States due to the threat it poses on
clean water and health. Lucky for New Yorkers, Governor Cuomo announced his ban
on fracking in December of 2014.
You might even say that Governor Cuomo was able to make
his decision, the right decision, with a little help from the 2012 documentary, Dear Governor Cuomo.
The film used a unique method to get their message across; it was a protest
within a concert within a documentary. Filmmaker Jon Bowermaster, instead of
taking the route of a traditional documentary, wanted to sway viewers and Governor
Cuomo with straight facts and an army of musicians, scientists, and activists
to back him up. If I’m being honest, Mark Ruffalo was enough for me to spark a
newfound interest in the issues of fracking.
The film transitioned from protest footage to interviews
with special guests such as Ruffalo, Natalie Merchant, and biologist Sandra
Steingraber to concert scenes. This is where Bowermaster lost me. Yes, the
traditional documentary can come off bland. It can lose the interest of its
viewers by lacking in originality and mistaking us all for programed robots
while an endless list of scientific facts are presented. But though I’m sure
the concert footage may have intended to inspire the film’s viewers, it used
far too much screen time and was seriously… painful. I wouldn’t be surprised if
Cuomo banned fracking just so he wouldn’t have to hear these people sing again.
The 2010 documentary, Gasland, was far
superior compared to Dear Governor Cuomo at
drawing in an audience. Directed and narrated by Josh Fox, his deep and raspy
dark knight voice kept me intrigued for the entire duration. Gasland opens with a committee of
politicians discussing hydraulic fracturing. The chairman thanks everyone and
is then told he doesn’t know what he’s even giving thanks for, followed by a
room full of laughter. The scene gives the viewers a good laugh at the
stupidity of the politicians and sets the tone. In case the viewer doesn’t know
what side of fracking Fox is on, they know now.
The power of Gasland
is in its ability to give the viewer a story to connect with. Fox’s style is
riveting and although he’s tackling an overwhelming topic, his sense of humor
is enough to allow us to swallow it painlessly. The style of editing is also
something admirable. There’s a contrast from showing images of the beauty of
the natural world to the horrors done by the fracking industry. I’ll never
forget the imagery of the tap water being set on fire. Gasland successfully gets the message across – fracking is a harsh
reality that needs to be stopped.
On par with the overwhelming information is an article
written by Sandra Steingraber, “The Fracking of Rachel Carson.” Steingraber is no rookie to environmental issues. She’s
an acclaimed ecologist, author, human rights and environmental activist, cancer
survivor and has even been arrested in her attempts at fighting for justice. Steingraber
brings a personal touch to Carson’s legacy, discussing her battle with cancer
as well as revealing why Carson fought for the things she did. For example,
Steingraber notes how at a young age, Carson found a fossilized seashell,
igniting her interest in the ocean. As an adult, she went on to write a best
selling trilogy about the sea. The insight to Carson’s personal life is
effectively placed into the bigger picture of human rights and environmental movements,
delivering a powerfully moving piece and overall a wake-up call.
Back to Gasland
for a moment, residents residing in areas near fracking wells were able to hold
a lighter under their running faucets and watch it ignite into flames. In other
words, there was so much methane in
their water that they could set it on
fire. Residents that weren’t busy setting their water on fire were
suffering from chronic health issues. Sandra Steingraber mentions in her
article that a case study conducted on the impacts of fracking showed vomiting,
seizures, stillbirths, fur loss, and even death in animals. Headaches,
nosebleeds, rashes, and vomiting were found in humans. In Steingraber’s book, Raising Elijah, she also notes that
air pollution caused by fracking has been linked to heart disease and cancer in
adults, as well as lower IQ, inadequate lung development, and asthma in
children. That’s pretty startling. Even though there hasn’t been a
comprehensive study conducted, as of yet, I’m certainly not about to move near
a fracking well.
Despite all the possible risks, there are still people
who aren’t against hydraulic fracturing. Governor Cuomo’s decision to ban
fracking in New York was highly covered by the media and either got him
applauds or dirty looks. According to an article published in the Wall Street Journal,
Governor Cuomo’s decision was deemed as hiding behind “bad science.” The author
boasts against the lack of studies against fracking and uses his sarcastic
humor to persuade readers to shun Governor Cuomo. It’s made very clear that
someone who puts money before health wrote the article. Sarcastically noting,
“economic growth sure can be a nuisance.” Perhaps, fracking in other states
have experienced great economical boosts but Governor Cuomo’s precautionary
decision to put health before money was the best choice for his re-election, as
well as for New Yorkers. Upstate residents may be giving the stink eye to the
“liberal elites” of the city and Long Island for now, but they’ll be thanking
them later. I mean, water can be set on
fire. Scientific certainty or not, that cannot
be safe.
As your blog buddy, I can say that this was the weakest of your blogs this year. I felt that you summarized way too much. Your first two paragraphs felt like word count filler, and didn't really do much for me. I would suggest that instead of taking an entire paragraph to summarize what fracking is, just hyperlink fracking or hydraulic fracturing to a good, unbiased website.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of links, you make minimal use of them. you didn't give us anything beyond book and movie titles. you didn't even include authors. I think that you can give more effort towards this requirement.
I couldn't help but laugh at the irony of you misspelling humanities. You left the "u" out of humanities. not a really big deal, but it was the third line of your blog, so it was a lot more noticeable than a typo in the middle of your blog.
"The 2010 documentary, Gasland, was far superior compared to Dear Governor Cuomo at drawing in an audience". This line comes across as being waaay to0 generalized. Maybe it was better at drawing your attention, but unless your going to back up a statement like that with statistics, you might want to re think how you word your opinions.
I would have liked to read your analysis of the writing style of "Raising Elijah" as compared to "the fracking of Rachel Carson". I know it was a late addition to this week's readings, but it really felt as if you only threw in the title to fulfill the requirement. We were exposed to a lot of Sandra Steingraber this week, and I thought you would have done a more thorough job analyzing her.
Your writing style is easy to read, and you have a nice writing voice. I think you need to objectively analyze the writings styles more, and give less opinion. Or if your going to give soo much opinion, don't do it at the expense of analyzing writing styles. I look forward to reading more of your work. I have a feeling you'll give us more next blog.
Sincerely,
Anthony